Pilot 4WD Sport vs RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Price Comparison
QAR 262410
QAR 116420
QAR 252450
QAR 111996
QAR 3532
QAR 1567
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7.18
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 50.23
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 222.43
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2618.88
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
4
3471cc
2490 cc
/
200 km/h
/
GCC
Dimensions
8
5 Seater
5089
4570 mm
1994
1845 mm
1801
1660 mm
2890
2660 mm
210
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
70
55 L
/
14.9 Km/L
/
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
Transmission
√
/
10
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
255/50 R20
/
255/50 R20
/
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
Engine
V
In-Line
3.5
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
/
3.5L V6 Quad Cam
/
4
4
11.5:1
/
DUAL VTC+Quad Cam
/
285
203 BHP
212.5
/
6100
/
355
243 Nm
5000
/
VCM 可变气缸管理
/
高压直喷
/
/
None
Technologies
√
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
