CarteaCompare CarsRAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2023 3.5L 3 Door mid

RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2023 3.5L 3 Door mid Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
  • Spacious and practical interior space
  • Reliability and quality of safety equipment

Negative

  • The suspension is a bit stiff
  • Use of lower quality interior materials
  • Less control of internal noise

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Price Comparison

QAR 116420

TBD

QAR 111996

TBD

QAR 1567

TBD

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.07 L/KM

0.13 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

QAR 7

Daily Fule Payment

QAR 13

Weekly Fule Payment

QAR 49

Weekly Fule Payment

QAR 91

Monthly Fule Payment

QAR 217

Monthly Fule Payment

QAR 403

Yearly Fule Payment

QAR 2555

Yearly Fule Payment

QAR 4745

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

/

12.5

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

180

4

/

2490 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

/

4570 mm

4385

1845 mm

1875

1660 mm

1850

2660 mm

2560

/

500

Fuel Economy

14.9 Km/L

7.7

55 L

69

14.9 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.5 L

3.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

None

/

4

/

203 BHP

184 BHP

243 Nm

303

Technologies

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX

VS

Jeep | Jeep Wrangler 2018 Sahara 3.6L Auto Plus

Toyota | RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX

VS

Jeep | Jeep Wrangler 2018 Rubicon 3.6L A/T

Toyota | RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX

VS

Jeep | Jeep Wrangler 2018 Sport Black Mountain 3.6L A/T

Toyota | RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX

VS

Jeep | Jeep Wrangler 2018 Rubicon X 3.6L A/T

Toyota | RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX

VS

Jeep | Jeep Wrangler 2018 Sport Black Mountain Ranger 3.6L A/T

Toyota Related Car

Mitsubishi Related Car