Song L 75KM Lead vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
TBD
QAR 245843
TBD
QAR 236511
TBD
QAR 3309
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.04 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 4.1
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11.27
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 28.7
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 78.93
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 114.8
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 315.7
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 1496.5
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4115.38
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
/
5 Doors
/
5115 mm
/
1980 mm
/
1920 mm
/
2890 mm
/
1004 L
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
26
9.4 Km/L
/
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
EHS
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Four Wheel Drive
Engine
1.5 L
4.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
100 BHP
271 BHP
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
385 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
