Tang L EV 670 Standard vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2023 3.5L 3 Door mid Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 13
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 91
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 390
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4745
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5040
4385
1996
1875
1760
1850
2950
2560
/
500
Fuel Economy
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
680 BHP
184 BHP
/
3.5 L
/
303
Technologies
/
✓
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
