Tang L EV 670 Standard vs Nissan Pathfinder 2023 3.5L S 4WD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Price Comparison
TBD
QAR 173560
TBD
QAR 167000
TBD
QAR 2336
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 77
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 330
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4015
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190
/
6
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
5040
5046
1996
1975
1760
1795
2950
2900
/
470
Fuel Economy
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
680 BHP
271 BHP
/
3.5 L
/
340
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
