Tang L EV 670 Standard vs Sportage Smartstream 2.0L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern design and comfortable cabin
- Spacious interior and comfortable seating
- Comprehensive intelligent technology and specifications
Negative
- Poor performance at high speeds
- The transmission response is slow when accelerating
- Internal materials need to be improved
Price Comparison
TBD
QAR 100067
TBD
QAR 96233
TBD
QAR 1347
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 56
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 240
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2920
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
220 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5040
4515 mm
1996
865 mm
1760
1650 mm
2950
2680 mm
/
4 Doors
/
591 L
/
/
Fuel Economy
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
680 BHP
152 BHP
/
In-Line
/
2.0 L
/
4
/
192 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
