Territory Titanium vs Mazda CX-5 2023 2.5L GS (FWD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Cohesive and stylish exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Balanced engine and steering performance
Negative
- Improve the quality of interior materials and assembly
- Modernization of technological and entertainment systems
- Improved suspension characteristics to reduce vibration
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 112780
QAR 108100
QAR 108500
QAR 104000
QAR 1518
QAR 1455
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.15
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7.18
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 43.05
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 50.23
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 190.65
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 222.43
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2244.75
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2618.88
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210
4
4
1798 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4630 mm
4550
1935 mm
1840
1706 mm
1670
2726 mm
2700
385 L
965
190 mm
/
Fuel Economy
15.9
14.7
60 L
58
12 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
12.3
/
✓
/
All Liquid Cluster
/
✓
/
Leather Trim
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.8 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
190 BHP
188 BHP
320
251
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
