Toyota Rush 2024 1.5L GX vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Economical fuel efficiency
Negative
- Engine performance is poor at high speeds
- Low quality interior design
- Lack of modern technical features
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
QAR 74880
QAR 55563
QAR 72000
QAR 53414
QAR 1008
QAR 748
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7.4
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 5.55
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 51.8
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 38.85
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 207.2
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 155.4
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2701
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2025.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
175
170
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4435
4323
1695
1809
1705
1653
2685
2585
213
359/1166
/
1318
/
17
/
5
/
145
Fuel Economy
12.5
17.2
45
45
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
✓
/
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
10.1
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
Wheels/brakes
/
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
103 BHP
118 BHP
135
180
/
88
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
