Tucson 2025 Comfort 1.6L vs RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Price Comparison
QAR 90707
QAR 116420
QAR 87234
QAR 111996
QAR 1221
QAR 1567
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 9
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 63
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 49
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 270
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 210
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3285
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2555
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1596 cc
2490 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
4500 mm
4570 mm
1865 mm
1845 mm
1650 mm
1660 mm
2680 mm
2660 mm
620 L
/
210 m
/
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
54 L
55 L
11 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.6 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
None
4
4
177 BHP
203 BHP
264 Nm
243 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
