CarteaCompare CarsVolkswagen CC 2014 2.0 S vs Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP)

Volkswagen CC 2014 2.0 S vs Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Reliability and durability of high performance
  • Riding comfort and roomy interior design
  • Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs

Negative

  • Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
  • Traditional exterior and interior design
  • Lack of sportsmanship in control

Price Comparison

TBD

QAR 101045

TBD

QAR 97225

TBD

QAR 1360

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.08 L/KM

0.07 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

QAR 8.2

Daily Fule Payment

QAR 7.18

Weekly Fule Payment

QAR 57.4

Weekly Fule Payment

QAR 50.23

Monthly Fule Payment

QAR 254.2

Monthly Fule Payment

QAR 222.43

Yearly Fule Payment

QAR 2993

Yearly Fule Payment

QAR 2618.88

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

Engine / Motor

240

195 km/h

4

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4802

4885 mm

1855

1840 mm

1417

1445 mm

2711

2824 mm

532

493 L

/

4 Doors

Fuel Economy

13.2

14.9 Km/L

70

60 L

/

14.9 Km/L

Comfort

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.8 L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

210 BHP

204 BHP

250

243 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Volkswagen | Volkswagen CC 2014 2.0 S

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Polo 2016 Sedan SE

Volkswagen | Volkswagen CC 2014 2.0 S

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Phaeton 2015 W12

Volkswagen | Volkswagen CC 2014 2.0 S

VS

Volvo | Volvo S90 2017 T6 Insciption Exclusive

Volkswagen | Volkswagen CC 2014 2.0 S

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Polo 2016 Sedan S

Volkswagen | Volkswagen CC 2014 2.0 S

VS

Volvo | Volvo S90 2017 T6 Inscription Plus

Volkswagen Related Car

Toyota Related Car