X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
QAR 102822
QAR 55563
QAR 98908
QAR 53414
QAR 1384
QAR 748
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.15
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.15
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 43.05
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 43.05
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 172.2
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 172.2
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2244.75
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2244.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
170
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
17
4
5
4680
4323
2065
1809
1730
1653
2705
2585
212
145
/
1318
/
359/1166
Fuel Economy
16.1
17.2
55
45
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Key
Smart Key
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
TFT
/
Front Row Seats
Front Row Seats
Fabric
Fabric
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
4
4
/
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
Xtronic CVT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Drive
Front Drive
Independent strut
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
Multi Link
H Torsional Beam
Wheels/brakes
Disc
Disc
Disc
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
Engine
2.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
181 BHP
118 BHP
181 @ 6,000
/
244
180
244 @ 4,000
/
/
88
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
AUTO-ECO-SPORT
/
Manual
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
