X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats vs RX5 1.5T STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 110917
QAR 84836
QAR 106681
QAR 81576
QAR 1493
QAR 1142
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.15
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7.18
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 43.05
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 50.23
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 190.65
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 222.43
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2244.75
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2618.88
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
17
18
4
/
4680
4571 mm
2065
1855 mm
1730
1719 mm
2705
2708 mm
212
145
/
430 L
Fuel Economy
15.7
14.7 Km/L
55
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
✓
✓
/
TFT
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
2
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
4
6
/
14.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
CVT
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Independent strut
/
Multi Link
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
/
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
181 BHP
171 BHP
181 @ 6,000
/
244
275 Nm
244 @ 4,000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
AUTO-ECO-SPORT-SNOW-OFF ROAD
/
Manual
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
