X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and attractive exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Excellent financial value for money for features
Negative
- The quality of internal manufacturing needs to be improved
- The suspension system needs better tuning
- Noise control is poor on highways
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 102381
QAR 139230
QAR 98505
QAR 133947
QAR 1378
QAR 1874
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8.4
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 10.5
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 58.8
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 73.5
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 260.4
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 325.5
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3066
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3832.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1598 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
20"
/
5 Doors
5 Doors
4724
4760 mm
1900
1930 mm
1720
1927 mm
2720
2750 mm
480 L
400 L
210 mm
224 m
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
10 Km/L
57 L
75 L
13 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
4 Way
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
/
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
10.25
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
8
9
Transmission
✓
/
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
MacPherson
/
Multi Link
/
EPS
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated
/
Disc
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.6T
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
4
4
197
224 BHP
5500
/
290
387 Nm
4000
/
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)