ZS 1.5L STD vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
QAR 55563
QAR 245843
QAR 53414
QAR 236511
QAR 748
QAR 3309
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 42
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 77
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 180
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 330
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2190
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4015
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
5 Doors
4323
5115 mm
1809
1980 mm
1653
1920 mm
2585
2890 mm
359/1166
1004 L
145
221 m
Fuel Economy
17.2
9.4 Km/L
45
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
Smart Entry
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
Fabric
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
9
✓
/
✓
/
4
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
271 BHP
88
/
180
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
