ZS 1.5L STD vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2023 3.5L 3 Door mid Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 55563
TBD
QAR 53414
TBD
QAR 748
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 13
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 42
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 91
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 186
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 403
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2190
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4745
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
180
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
4385
1809
1875
1653
1850
2585
2560
359/1166
500
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
7.7
45
69
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
184 BHP
88
/
180
303
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
