ZS 1.5L STD vs Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- Outstanding off-road performance
- Outstanding engine power
- Spacious and luxurious interior design
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Slow electronic system response
Price Comparison
QAR 55563
TBD
QAR 53414
TBD
QAR 748
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.15
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 43.05
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 190.65
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2244.75
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
240 km/h
/
6
/
3492 cc
/
Japanese
Dimensions
5 Seater
8 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
5 Doors
4323
5350 mm
1809
2030 mm
1653
1955 mm
2585
3075 mm
359/1166
836 L
145
253 m
Fuel Economy
17.2
/
45
97 L
/
7.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
Smart Entry
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
14.3
✓
/
✓
/
4
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
425 BHP
88
/
180
700 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
