ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 vs Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2023 2.0T Flagship Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 72578
QAR 113300
QAR 69790
QAR 109000
QAR 977
QAR 1525
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.3
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7.35
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 44.1
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 51.45
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 195.3
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 227.85
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2299.5
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2682.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
/
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
1318
/
18
/
5
/
4430
4722
1818
1860
1635
1705
2610
2710
359/1166
/
145
/
Fuel Economy
15.9
14.9
45
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Passenger Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
168
254 BHP
88
/
180
390
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
