06 Hyper Pro vs Coolray 2025 GF+ Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Price Comparison
QAR 90786
QAR 93457
QAR 87328
QAR 89882
QAR 1222
QAR 1258
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.65
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 5.7
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 46.55
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 39.9
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 206.15
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 176.7
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2427.25
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2080.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
1497 cc
/
200 km/h
/
Chinese
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5
4350
4380 mm
1820
1810 mm
1625
1615 mm
2640
2600 mm
/
18
/
4 Doors
/
330 L
/
180 mm
Fuel Economy
15
16 Km/L
51
45 L
/
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
10.25
10.25
Dual
/
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
Safety
✓
/
6
2
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
6
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
7DCT
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
L
In-Line
1.5 L
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
4
4
181 BHP
172
133
/
5500
/
290
290 Nm
2000-3500
/
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
