3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1 vs Hiace Van STD DSL AT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
QAR 133950
QAR 134024
QAR 128846
QAR 128919
QAR 1803
QAR 1804
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7.6
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 53.2
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 212.8
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2774
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
Dimensions
3
3
2021kg
2215
16
16
6193
5265
2283
1990
3682
3210
4.5T
3300
166
/
/
1950
/
5.5m
/
2530 - 1760 - 1340
/
6.2m³
/
1085
Fuel Economy
100
70
/
13.0 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
Driver Seat
Driver Seat
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
4.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Side Driver Airbag.Driver & Passenger Airbags.
Driver & Front Passenger
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
7
8
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
2
Transmission
✓
/
6-Speed Manual Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Drive
/
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.3
2.8
Diesel
Diesel
125
174
/
450
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
