Captiva LT vs Coolray 2025 GF+ Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical fuel consumption
- Comfortable and spacious interior space
- Competitive price for specifications
Negative
- Average engine performance
- The quality of interior materials need to improve
- A feature limited entertainment system
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Price Comparison
QAR 89743
QAR 93457
QAR 86312
QAR 89882
QAR 1208
QAR 1258
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 42
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 186
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2190
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1497 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
18
18
1051L
330 L
/
4 Doors
/
4380 mm
/
1810 mm
/
1615 mm
/
2600 mm
/
180 mm
Fuel Economy
/
16 Km/L
/
45 L
/
16 Km/L
Comfort
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✔
✔
/
Smart Key
Keyless Entry
Manual
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Interior
3.5
10.25
✔
/
diagonal display
/
Front Row Seats
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
/
✔
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
Electric
/
✔
/
✔
/
Bucket
Safety
4 Front and sides, 2 side curtain
/
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Infotainment
10.4
12.3
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Android LCD
✔
/
✔
✔
✔
/
4
6
/
✔
/
✔
Transmission
CVT
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Mcpherson
/
Wheels/brakes
✔
/
✔
/
Exterior
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✔
HALOGEN
LED
✔
✔
✔
/
✔
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Engine
1.5 L
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
144 BHP
172
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
290 Nm
Technologies
✔
/
✔
/
Manual
/
✔
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
