City LX 1.5L vs Qin Plus Premium Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 75187
QAR 77196
QAR 72331
QAR 74278
QAR 1012
QAR 1039
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8.2
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.15
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 57.4
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 43.05
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 246
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 184.5
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2993
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2244.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
185
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
4
4553 mm
4765
1788 mm
1837
1467 mm
1495
2650 mm
2720
506 L
500
/
Flush Door
/
1500
/
17
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
15.6
40 L
48
13 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
Infotainment
/
10.1-inch rotating screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Battery/Charging
/
6.6
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
Wheels/brakes
/
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
None
/
4
/
119 BHP
177 BHP
145 Nm
325
/
Plug in Hybrid
Exterior
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
