Coolray 2025 GL vs MG HS 2024 2.0T Comfort Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 78224
QAR 82100
QAR 75216
QAR 79000
QAR 1053
QAR 1105
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.15
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8.2
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 43.05
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 57.4
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 190.65
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 254.2
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2244.75
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2993
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210
4
4
1477 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4 Doors
/
4380 mm
4574
1810 mm
1876
1615 mm
1685
2600 mm
2720
330 L
463
180 mm
/
Fuel Economy
16 Km/L
12.2
45 L
55
16 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
172 BHP
231 BHP
290 Nm
360
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
