Coolray 2025 GL vs Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- Outstanding off-road performance
- Outstanding engine power
- Spacious and luxurious interior design
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Slow electronic system response
Price Comparison
QAR 78224
TBD
QAR 75216
TBD
QAR 1053
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.15
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 43.05
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 190.65
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2244.75
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
240 km/h
4
6
1477 cc
3492 cc
Chinese
Japanese
Dimensions
5 Seater
8 Seater
17
/
4 Doors
5 Doors
4380 mm
5350 mm
1810 mm
2030 mm
1615 mm
1955 mm
2600 mm
3075 mm
330 L
836 L
180 mm
253 m
Fuel Economy
16 Km/L
/
45 L
97 L
16 Km/L
7.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
/
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
/
✓
/
Single
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
Bucket
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
14.3
✓
✓
✓
/
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
6
12
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
1.5 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
172 BHP
425 BHP
290 Nm
700 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
√
/
/
✓
