Honda City 2024 1.5L LX Sport vs Qin Plus Premium Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 73840
QAR 77196
QAR 70999
QAR 74278
QAR 994
QAR 1039
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 56
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 42
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 248
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 186
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2920
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2190
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
185
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4553
4765
1748
1837
1467
1495
2600
2720
510
500
/
Flush Door
/
1500
/
17
/
4
Fuel Economy
13.3
15.6
40
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.1-inch rotating screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Battery/Charging
/
6.6
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
/
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
119 BHP
177 BHP
145
325
/
Plug in Hybrid
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
