CarteaCompare CarsHS 2.0T Comfort vs ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

HS 2.0T Comfort vs ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Attractive and striking exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Reliable and consistent performance

Negative

  • The space of the rear seats is limited
  • The infotainment system is outdated
  • Limited engine choices

Price Comparison

QAR 81495

QAR 82534

QAR 78375

QAR 79368

QAR 1097

QAR 1111

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.08 L/KM

0.08 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

QAR 8

Daily Fule Payment

QAR 8

Weekly Fule Payment

QAR 56

Weekly Fule Payment

QAR 56

Monthly Fule Payment

QAR 248

Monthly Fule Payment

QAR 248

Yearly Fule Payment

QAR 2920

Yearly Fule Payment

QAR 2920

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

Engine / Motor

210 km/h

193 km/h

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4574 mm

4355 mm

1876 mm

1810 mm

1685 mm

1625 mm

2720 mm

2670 mm

463 L

358 L

Fuel Economy

12.2 Km/L

12.5 Km/L

55 L

63 L

12.2 Km/L

12.5 Km/L

Comfort

/

Safety

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Exterior

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

231 BHP

150 BHP

360 Nm

197 Nm

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | HS 2.0T Comfort

VS

Geely | Geely Coolray 2023 1.5TD Luxury GF+ (SR)

MG | HS 2.0T Comfort

VS

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

MG | HS 2.0T Comfort

VS

Jaecoo | J5

MG | HS 2.0T Comfort

VS

Changan | CS35 Plus Limited

MG | HS 2.0T Comfort

VS

MG | MG HS 2024 2.0T Comfort

MG Related Car

Mitsubishi Related Car