Master L4H3 vs Toyota Hiace 2020 2.8L LWB Van M/T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
QAR 114036
QAR 106020
QAR 109677
QAR 102000
QAR 1535
QAR 1427
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7.6
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 53.2
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 212.8
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2774
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Van
/
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
160
Dimensions
3
3 Seater
2420
/
16
/
6848
5915
2808
2280
4332
3860
4.5T
/
167
/
17m³
/
/
1950
/
6200
Fuel Economy
100
70
/
13.3
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.3
2.8 L
Diesel
Diesel
125
174 BHP
/
420
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
