MG5 1.5L CVT STD vs Suzuki Ciaz 2024 1.5L GL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and youthful design
- Fuel efficiency
- Spacious interior space
Negative
- Average engine performance
- Sound insulation is limited
- Interior materials of medium quality
Positive
- Very economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low purchase and maintenance cost
Negative
- Relatively poor engine performance
- The quality of interior materials is amenable to improvement
- Lack of advanced technological features
Price Comparison
QAR 50746
QAR 51180
QAR 48827
QAR 49200
QAR 683
QAR 689
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 42
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 42
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 180
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 180
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2190
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2190
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
184
165
4
4
1495 mL
/
Middle East
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1210
/
15
/
4
/
4607
4490
1818
1730
1489
1475
2680
2650
406
495
Fuel Economy
16.8
16.7
45
43
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
3.5
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Driver Seat
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Front airbag
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson strut
/
Torsion beam
/
Electronic power steering
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Disc
/
Disc
/
195/65 R15
/
195/65 R15
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
/
4
/
DOHC
/
110 BHP
103 BHP
81
/
4500
/
140
138
6000
/
Euro 6
/
Motor
110
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
