Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
QAR 71760
QAR 245843
QAR 69000
QAR 236511
QAR 966
QAR 3309
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.15
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11.27
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 43.05
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 78.93
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 190.65
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 349.53
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2244.75
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4115.38
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
210 km/h
4
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4295
5115 mm
1760
1980 mm
1590
1920 mm
2620
2890 mm
432
1004 L
/
5 Doors
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
15.4
9.4 Km/L
41
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
271 BHP
149
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
