Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S vs C5 2025 Comfort Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 71760
QAR 71918
QAR 69000
QAR 69186
QAR 966
QAR 968
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 5.7
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8.55
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 39.9
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 59.85
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 176.7
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 265.05
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2080.5
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3120.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
180 km/h
4
4
/
1496 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4295
4400
1760
1830
1590
1588
2620
2630
432
360/1075
/
1381
/
5
Fuel Economy
15.4
11.2
41
51
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
10.25
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
Macpherson
/
Torsion Beam
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
/
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
156 BHP
149
230
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
