Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S vs LX Flagship 1.6T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 71760
TBD
QAR 69000
TBD
QAR 966
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.15
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 7.18
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 43.05
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 50.23
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 172.2
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 200.9
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2244.75
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2618.88
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
200 km/h
4
4
/
1598 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4295
4520 mm
1760
1848 mm
1590
1690 mm
2620
2670 mm
432
400 L
/
5 Doors
/
200 m
Fuel Economy
15.4
14 Km/L
41
50 L
/
14 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
197 BHP
149
290 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
