Raize XLE vs C5 2025 Comfort Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Compact size for flexible urban driving
- Integrated technological equipment
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- The quality of interior materials need improvement
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 67675
QAR 71918
QAR 65074
QAR 69186
QAR 911
QAR 968
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 5.13
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 9.23
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 35.88
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 64.57
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 158.88
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 285.97
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 1870.62
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3367.12
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
3
4
/
180 km/h
/
1496 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5
16
/
4030
4400
1710
1830
1635
1588
/
1381
/
5
/
2630
/
360/1075
Fuel Economy
21.1
11.2
36
51
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.25
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver And Front Passenger
4
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
7
10.25
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
4
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
Macpherson
/
Torsion Beam
Wheels/brakes
205/65 R16
215/60 R17
205/65 R16
215/60 R17
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Halogen
LED
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.2
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
87
156 BHP
113
230
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
ECO, Sport
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
