Tahoe RST vs Defender 110 HSE (P400) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Luxurious and durable interior design
- Multiple options for powerful engines
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- A bit complicated infotainment system
Price Comparison
QAR 312565
QAR 312042
QAR 300722
QAR 300209
QAR 4207
QAR 4200
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 10
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 10
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 70
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 70
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 310
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 310
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3650
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3650
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
208 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
22
/
5 Doors
5 Doors
5181
5018 mm
2053
2008 mm
1925
1965 mm
3071
3022 mm
3479
/
Fuel Economy
9.7
10.1 Km/L
100
90 L
/
10.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Interior
10.2
/
Jet Black/Victory Red perforated leather seating
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
frontal airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; seat-mounted side-impact airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; driver inboard seat-mounted side-impact airbag; headcurtain airbags for all rows in outboard seating positions3,4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
9
/
BOSE
/
Transmission
Electronic Limited Slip Differential (Active Reponse 4WD)
/
AT
/
10
/
10AT
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Electronic Limited Slip Differential (Active Reponse 4WD)
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
6.2 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
420 BHP
400 BHP
624
550 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
