Tucson Comfort 1.6L vs Changan CS95 2021 2.0T Platinum (7-Seater) AWD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 90707
QAR 102900
QAR 87234
QAR 99000
QAR 1221
QAR 1385
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 9.23
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 10.25
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 64.57
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 71.75
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 285.97
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 317.75
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3367.12
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3741.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
190
4
4
1596 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4 Doors
/
4500 mm
4949
1865 mm
1930
1650 mm
1790
2680 mm
2810
620 L
/
210 m
/
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
10.2
54 L
74
11 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
177 BHP
233 BHP
264 Nm
360
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
