CarteaCompare CarsVolvo S40 2013 Comfort SE vs Volkswagen Polo 2016 Sedan S

Volvo S40 2013 Comfort SE vs Volkswagen Polo 2016 Sedan S Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Price Comparison

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.06 L/KM

0.07 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

QAR 6

Daily Fule Payment

QAR 7

Weekly Fule Payment

QAR 42

Weekly Fule Payment

QAR 49

Monthly Fule Payment

QAR 186

Monthly Fule Payment

QAR 217

Yearly Fule Payment

QAR 2190

Yearly Fule Payment

QAR 2555

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Engine / Motor

215

185

4

4

Dimensions

5 Seater

4 Seater

4476

4384

1770

1699

1454

1465

2460

2552

404

455

Fuel Economy

17.5

14.3

55

55

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Manual

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

145 BHP

105 BHP

185

153

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Volvo | Volvo S40 2013 Comfort SE

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Polo 2016 Sedan SE

Volvo | Volvo S40 2013 Comfort SE

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Phaeton 2015 W12

Volvo | Volvo S40 2013 Comfort SE

VS

Volvo | Volvo S90 2017 T6 Insciption Exclusive

Volvo | Volvo S40 2013 Comfort SE

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Polo 2016 Sedan S

Volvo | Volvo S40 2013 Comfort SE

VS

Volvo | Volvo S90 2017 T6 Inscription Plus

Volvo Related Car

Volkswagen Related Car