X5 M50i xDrive vs Land Cruiser 3.5T GR-Sport Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- The power of dynamic performance
- Luxurious interior design and advanced equipment
- Convenient and thoughtful space distribution
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Complexity in the operation of electronic systems
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
QAR 440286
QAR 424835
QAR 423626
QAR 408771
QAR 5926
QAR 5718
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 11
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 77
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 77
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 341
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 341
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4015
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 4015
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4922 mm
4995 mm
2004 mm
1990 mm
1745 mm
1925 mm
2975 mm
2850 mm
645 L
1004 L
/
5 Doors
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
9.5 Km/L
9.3 Km/L
83 L
110 L
9.5 Km/L
9.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
4.4 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
530 BHP
409 BHP
750 Nm
650 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
