ZS 1.5L LUX vs Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Price Comparison
QAR 72578
QAR 71760
QAR 69790
QAR 69000
QAR 977
QAR 966
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 42
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 42
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 186
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 186
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2190
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2190
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
180
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
4295
1809
1760
1653
1590
2585
2620
359/1166
432
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
15.4
45
41
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Passenger Seat
✓
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
118 BHP
88
/
180
149
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
