ZS 1.5L STD vs X35 1.5L CVT Luxury Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
QAR 55563
QAR 56162
QAR 53414
QAR 54007
QAR 748
QAR 756
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.15
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 43.05
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 184.5
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2244.75
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
1318
1340
17
17
5
/
4323
4286
1809
1815
1653
1665
2585
2560
359/1166
390
145
180
/
1765
Fuel Economy
17.2
/
45
46
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
Front Row Seats
Fabric
Leather Fabric Mixed Seats
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
Driver And Passenger Airbag.Side Airbag.
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
T125/80 R15
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
✓
✓
/
4
6
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
MacPhersan
H Torsional Beam
H torsion beam type
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
Solid Disc
215/55 R17
215/50 R17
215/55 R17
215/50 R17
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
134
88
/
180
210
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
