ZS 1.5T LUX vs Jeep Wrangler 2017 CJ (Hardtop) Sport 3.6L M/T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 5.55
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 10.18
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 38.85
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 71.23
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 155.4
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 284.9
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2025.75
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3713.88
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
12.8
/
Engine / Motor
170
157
/
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
4223
1809
1873
1653
1865
2585
2268
359/1166
360
145
/
Fuel Economy
15.9
8.8
45
70
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Passenger Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
168
285 BHP
/
347
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
