C5 2025 Comfort vs Dashing 1.6L Turbo Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Integrated interior fittings
- Excellent value for the price
Negative
- Engine performance needs improvement
- Noise insulation is limited by driving methods
- The suspension is solid off-road
Price Comparison
QAR 71918
QAR 112408
QAR 69186
QAR 108138
QAR 968
QAR 1513
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 9.23
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 8.2
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 64.57
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 57.4
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 285.97
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 254.2
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3367.12
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2993
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1496 cc
1590 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1381
/
5
5 Doors
4400
4590 mm
1830
1900 mm
1588
1685 mm
2630
2720 mm
360/1075
/
/
160 mm
Fuel Economy
11.2
12 Km/L
51
57 L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
✓
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
4
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
10.25
15.6
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
✓
/
6
8
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Macpherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
156 BHP
194 BHP
230
290 Nm
/
None
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
ECO, Sport
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
