C5 2025 Comfort vs Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Price Comparison
QAR 71918
QAR 71760
QAR 69186
QAR 69000
QAR 968
QAR 966
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 9.23
Daily Fule Payment
QAR 6.15
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 64.57
Weekly Fule Payment
QAR 43.05
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 285.97
Monthly Fule Payment
QAR 190.65
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 3367.12
Yearly Fule Payment
QAR 2244.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
180
4
4
1496 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1381
/
5
/
4400
4295
1830
1760
1588
1590
2630
2620
360/1075
432
Fuel Economy
11.2
15.4
51
41
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
✓
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Macpherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
156 BHP
118 BHP
230
149
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
ECO, Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
